JETS 24:2 (June 1981) p. 121 and purposes. This rather belated acceptance of the results of gospel criticism and the consequences in any but a token manner first occurred once again in Stonehouse’s work.23 But it was F. F. Bruce in 197024 who actually set forth for evangelicals the state of the art in gospel studies for the first time in all boldness. This turn of events in gospel studies by evangelicals reflects in no fashion a mere accommodation to “scholarship” or a faddish desire to mimic the